MacNoob

When the first iPhone became available two years ago, I wanted one worse than anything. Unfortunately, I was locked into a contract with Verizon that wouldn’t expire for ten months. Of course, by the time that contract was done we knew the 3G version of the phone was eminent, so I waited a tad more. The lines (and frenzy) subsided a few days after the 3G launch, so I went and got my 16 GB phone at my local Apple store for $299 and said goodbye to Verizon. I was completely thrilled.
The first couple of months were rocky. I had to restore the thing no less than four times before Apple fixed enough bugs in the 2.0 software to keep the phone from crashing into an un-bootable state. Since then, life with my device has been grand. It has become so much a part of my daily existence, I don’t know how I got along without it.
Last Monday at the WWDC keynote we got the official word that the 3GS model would be available this month with a beefed-up processor, a compass and voice commands that my 3G wouldn’t have. My techno-lust immediately went into overdrive. As soon as the day’s sessions were over I went to Apple’s website to see just how much this new bangle would set me back. To my chagrin, the 16 gig model was $399 and the 32 gig was $100 more and I wouldn’t be eligible for an AT&T upgrade until 12/15/2009. Crap! At that point I’m thinking I’ll get my “S” model for Christmas. I’m an admitted fanboy, but I’m no idiot (my opinion only, think what you like). There’s no way I’m going to pay double what a new AT&T customer pays, no matter how much I want the phone. Its not the $200, its the principle. I immediately sent a “nasty-gram” to AT&T Wireless expressing my dissatisfaction with their pricing model. From what I hear, I was not alone.
As I prepared to write this, I visited Apple’s site again to make sure I had my facts straight and a curious thing happened. The $399 – $499 pricing was the same, but my upgrade eligibility date changed from 12/15/09 to 7/15/09! I thought this was a fluke, so I went to the AT&T site and the results were the same. Something has changed (in my favor) in the last week. Did AT&T cave to the mass protest from 3G owners? I’ll be curious to see what happens on July 15th.

Update: AT&T has made it official. On their site:

“we are changing the date when some iPhone 3G customers are eligible for our best upgrade pricing on the new iPhone 3G S. Beginning June 19, iPhone 3G customers eligible for an upgrade in July, August, or September will get our best upgrade price of $199 (16 GB) and $299 (32 GB).”

 Email This Post

A friend of mine sent me an e-mail asking how my WWDC experience was. I replied: “It’s like drinking from a fire hose!” That response may have been a bit melodramatic, but I still stand by it. The conference presents so much information so concisely its difficult (if not impossible) for a mere mortal to absorb it all. If you’ve ever seen a video of an Apple keynote you have an idea of how polished their presentations tend to be. Even though the subject matter was different, every session I attended at this year’s WWDC was put together that well. Instead of talking about new Macs or iPhones like in a keynote, the session presenters talked about new code constructs, OS X Leopard features or any of 100+ different subjects at varying levels of detail and complexity. The labs were done just as well. The first floor of Moscone West was over half lab space, filled with enough new Apple hardware to make any fanboy think he was at the North Pole with Santa Steve and the four labs I attended were staffed with knowledgeable, helpful engineers. As is customary with Apple, nothing gets done half way.

I spent the week attending five sessions (or labs) per day and every one of those sessions were professionally architected and excellently presented. As impressive as that may be, Apple orchestrated over 280 sessions and labs for more than 5000 developers and from everything I’ve been able to gather, they all went well. In fact, I had a difficult time deciding which session to attend on several occasions. There were typically over twenty sessions and labs available for every time slot and odds were, there would be more than one that interested me. Fortunately, Apple will post video of all the sessions on their site so I won’t have to miss anything.

As valuable as the presented material was, the availability of Apple engineers and their willingness to help was of equal worth. Every session ended with a Q & A and I gleaned a ton of information without ever stepping up to the mic. The four labs I attended proved to be some of the best time I spent all week because the engineers were available to answer my questions and provide guidance for my specific problems. I also enjoyed the 100Mb internet connection whenever I plugged my Mac into one of the lab’s hardwire ethernet connections. I don’t know about you, but I’ve never experienced a connection anywhere near that fast. I took the opportunity to download all the available SDKs and iPhone OS versions and snuck in a HD movie download to boot. The new James Bond flick downloaded both versions (>4.5GB) in about 10 minutes! My 5Mb connection at home usually takes a couple of hours. But I digress…

My only regret was not having enough time to mingle with other developers. While Apple provided lots of seating and internet connectivity outside the sessions and labs, I just never seemed to have the time to take advantage of it for fear of missing some of the prepared material. This is one thing I’ve vowed to change next year. No doubt, I’ll be back!

 Email This Post

I quit my last job because the promised 15% travel turned into something closer to 50%, so getting on an airplane is not my idea of a good time.  Be that as it may, I can’t wait to fly to San Francisco this Sunday to attend my first WWDC (Apple’s World Wide Developer Conference).  Aside from providing an escape from Houston’s already oppressive 90+ degree heat and 100% humidity, the Bay Area is hosting nothing less than “nerdvana” for five days next week.  I really try not to get caught up in all the fanboy hype, but as WWDC draws closer, the Apple rumor mill output goes off-scale, piquing my anticipation.

Everybody tends to focus speculation on Monday’s keynote, and while I’m excited about it I must admit [as a fledgling Apple developer] the lineup of sessions and labs I’ll be attending has me more excited than Johnny Five in a Barnes & Noble.  If Apple delivers half of what they promise on their web site, the trip will be well worth the three grand I’ve invested in it.  There is a ton of new technology to cover this year, even by Apple’s standards.  OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) is looming on the horizon, iPhone OS 3.0 is due to be released this month and we don’t even know what new magical hardware Mr. Schiller will introduce during Monday’s keynote.  There will probably be a new iPhone, maybe a larger tablet-like device.  Speculation ranges from the probable to the completely implausible but what is certain: Apple will spring something surprising, they always do.  I’m getting stoked just writing about it all.

It’s easy to lose sight of what the “D” in WWDC stands for amidst all the speculation and hype, especially if you’re on the outside looking in.  As I try to plan my week using the published schedule of sessions and labs, I get snapped back to reality in short order.  This is going to be real work! I even wonder if my poor brain still has the capacity to assimilate all the information being offered.  It’s going to be like drinking from a fire hose.  Compounding this dilemma, I’m certain I’ll be attempting at least a portion of this task with a (hopefully)mild hangover.  Oh well, all I can do is give it my best shot and hope to capture what I need.

Beyond everything I just described, what I most look forward to is the intangible.  I’ll be immersed in all the Apple goodness with the people who build OS X, the iPhone OS and  the applications that run on them.  Me, right in the middle of the event that all the blogs, news and fanboy sites will be focused on next week is like an escape from the every-day, mundane routine and a pilgrimage to the center of the Apple universe.  For a few short days this is where it’s happening, and I’m going to be a part of it.  Cool.

 Email This Post

I sorted through an iCal problem the other day and I thought I’d share it with everyone.  I, like many others subscribe to a couple of calendars in iCal on my Macs, namely U.S. Holidays and the Houston Astros schedule.  The problem is, if you sync calendars via Mobile Me, calendars you subscribe to can’t be published and won’t sync to an iPhone or iPod Touch.  There is a way to work around this and it’s fairly simple.  The only tools you’ll need come with your Mac.  Here’s what you do:

1. In the iCal menu select <Calendar><Find Shared Calendars…>.  This will launch your browser and take you to published iCal calendars on Apple’s download website.
2. Find a calendar you want and right-click (control-click) its’ “Download” button and select “Copy Link”.
3. Paste the link into a new browser window’s address bar but DO NOT PRESS ENTER.
4. The URL should look something like: webcal://ical.mac.com/ical/…
5. Change “webcal” to “http” and hit Enter.
6. If you did everything right, what will be displayed is the content of the .ics file that iCal understands.
7. In your browser menu, select <File><Save> from the menu and save the file to your desktop.  Safari and Firefox will both append a “.txt” to the filename so it looks something like this: “USHolidays.ics.txt”
8. Rename the file removing the “.txt” portion.
9. In the iCal menu select <File><Import…> and select the file you just renamed and iCal will ask you which of your calendars you’d like to import the new file to. (or you can create an new calendar for the new events beforehand)
10. Select one of your calendars and click “Continue”.
11. That’s it!  The new events will show up in the calendar you specified.

If the calendar you specified is one you publish to Mobile Me, the new events will be published also and will be synchronized across all your Mobile Me machines and devices.

 Email This Post

One of the first entries to this blog was about the original diNovo Edge I was using with my MacBook Pro.  At the time, I proclaimed it to be the world’s greatest keyboard.  I bought the new Mac Edition of the Edge about two months ago and my opinion hasn’t changed one bit.

Aside from being the sexiest looking keyboard on the market, the Mac Edition Edge now performs Mac-specific functions right out of the box while maintaining the same dreamy tactile response and perfect key placement I’ve come to love.  Other similarities with the Windows version include:

• Bluetooth connectivity
• Touch sensitive volume slider
• Built-in touchpad with scroll
• Left & right mouse buttons
• Mute button

What sets the Mac Edition apart (besides the normal placement of the control, option and command keys) are the several pre-configured Mac-specific functions built into the function keys and other custom buttons.  Additionally, the included Logitech Control Center application that installs in System Preferences allows you to completely customize all the function keys to your liking.  I’ve stuck with the defaults because each function key has a graphic indicating what it controls.  Located at the upper right is a Front Row button that does what it says and on the upper left there is a power button you can configure to log off, sleep or power down your Mac.

The black glass key surface and aluminum palm rest make for a beautiful addition to even the most style-conscious desktop and this color scheme goes particularly well with the new iMacs.  The included charging stand matches the keyboard exactly but battery life is so long I tend to forget where I’ve put the thing.

My only complaint about the Edge is its’ glass surface is a fingerprint magnet.  Logitech provides a cleaning cloth and if you’re like me you’ll keep it handy.  Without regular cleaning, the Edge quickly looks like someone typed on it using KFC drumsticks instead of fingers.

Asking someone about their favorite keyboard is almost like asking them about their favorite color.  There’s really no correct answer and it usually comes down to personal preference.  My preference is the diNovo Edge Mac Edition even with its’ $160 price tag.  I bought mine on Amazon for $112 and they’re pretty easy to find below $130 elsewhere.

 Email This Post

Apple’s recent hiring of Bob Drebin has sparked a tsunami of speculation as to Apple’s intentions regarding chip design and manufacture.  AppleInsider points to LinkedIn profiles of Drebin and Wei-han Lein to support their speculation about a new, home-grown mobile processor for Apple’s iPhone and iPod Touch successors.  With last year’s purchase of PA Semi, over $25 billion in the bank and all the new hardware hotshots including Mark Papermaster, Apple seems to have all the pieces in place to mount a serious effort to design and build its own chips.  The question is: For what?

Consensus among pundits points to the afore-mentioned mobile processor and that may be true, but I think they have something else up their sleeve.  Looking closely at Mr. Papermaster’s hardware group, one finds a ton of engineers (some say over 100) with graphic chip design and manufacturing backgrounds.  I’m starting to believe Apple has a desire to make its own graphics hardware.  Here’s why…

1. OpenCL technology (that leverages GPU capabilities) built into Snow Leopard promises to take OS X performance to the next level once application development catches up to the standard.  This just feels like something Apple would leverage by controlling the hardware and API completely.
2. Intel and Nvidia sue each other so frequently their lawyers have their own parking spots at the courthouse.  Apple has clearly staked its foreseeable [Mac]hardware designs on Intel and everyone seems to agree, that was the correct move.  If the squabbling gets nastier, Apple may have to distance itself from Nvidia to avoid getting caught in the middle.
3. AMD (owners of ATI) has to be reeling from the exodus en masse of their key engineering people.  I don’t think their graphics product pipeline has run empty yet, but with so many ex-employees now in Cupertino, ATI no longer seems like the kind of company Apple would need to partner with.
4. If ATI and NVidia are both undesirable, that leaves…NOBODY! (Yes, I know Intel makes graphics chipsets, but Apple’s last hardware refresh ditched them altogether.  The divorce is final.) Apple clearly hopes to make OpenCL a differentiator between OS X and Windows.  Given its history of tight (and closed) coupling of OS X to its hardware, Apple may not wish to bet the farm on any technology they don’t own outright.

Any of these reasons, taken separately, don’t amount to much, but together they make a strong argument for both the means and motive for Apple to build their own graphics hardware.  Couple that with a $25 billion bankroll and there’s no doubt they could if they wanted to.  Now it’s just a question of Apple’s desire and few ever seem to guess that right.

 Email This Post